So first Dreadnought --> later Dreadnoughts --> First super dreadnought?

　　What would that be for Britain?

　　所以說，英國科技樹是“無畏——晚期無畏——超無畏”這種路子咯?

　　Currently it goes like this: Dreadnought / Colossus --> Orion --> Iron Duke though there are plans to amend it later on.

　　嘛，英國科技樹是這樣的無畏級(jí)/巨人級(jí)——獵戶座級(jí)——鐵公爵級(jí)

　　So we know what the Tier X Fighters will be for the US and IJN ships will be, to back up, they would be the F2H and J7W2, but what about the other lines? Common Sense will tell us that the Sea Meteor F.3 will be the Tier X for the Brits, so that leaves the Germans, French (who probably will use a British or American plane) and the USSR, but do you have any ideas on what these would be?

　　嗯，我們都知道美帝和本子的10級(jí)艦載機(jī)分別是F2H(Banshee，也就是報(bào)喪女妖

　　)和震電，但是其他國家的呢?英國應(yīng)該是海流星F3，那么德國呢?法國呢?蘇聯(lián)呢?

　　We don*t have this information yet - its still at design stage. Plane models are much quicker to make, so we are taking our time with design.

　　嘛，現(xiàn)在不清楚————現(xiàn)在這這些國家還處于設(shè)計(jì)階段。話說飛機(jī)建模很容易，所以我們主要花時(shí)間在設(shè)計(jì)上面。

　　In this Japanese review, reporter claimed that buoyancy damage is too difficult to balance so developers just abandoned it. Is this claim true?

　　The buoyancy damage has already become abandoned idea or just waits for rebalancing?

　　嘛，在TGS的評(píng)測(cè)文章中，作者說BP槽因?yàn)椴缓米鏊跃腿∠耍钦娴拿? 話說BP槽是被廢棄了呢?都還是要被重制?

　　Yes, we dropped the second "health bar", showing buoyancy, at least for the time being. It did not serve the function we wanted it to serve. If we really need it for something, we might bring it back.

　　是啊，BP條被放棄了，這玩意其實(shí)就是另一個(gè)血條。這玩意并沒有達(dá)到我們預(yù)期的效果。如果我們真的要這些的話，我們會(huì)重做BP的

　　Here are my new questions:

　　1)How will the top tier Russian destroyers look like? I assume it could be something like this:

　　VIII: Leningrad

　　IX: Tashkent

　　X: Kiev

　　話說毛子驅(qū)逐線是不是這樣? 8級(jí)列寧格勒，9級(jí)塔什干，10級(jí)基輔?

　　1) Currently its Leningrad --> Kiev --> Tashkent --> tier X Light Cruiser MLK (130)

　　是這樣的，列寧格勒(7)基輔(8) 塔什干(9) 輕巡MLK130(10)

　　2)Will destroyers be able to fire their main guns at planes? If their mounts were dual purpose of course like the 5"/38 of the US ones.

　　那些主炮就是高平兩用炮的驅(qū)逐艦?zāi)懿荒苡弥髋趯?duì)空?

　　2) No, at least not directly.

　　至少不能直接對(duì)空射擊

　　Another video, another question. According to this video published on the blog, "cruisers" can take guns as large as 381mm. Does this reflect an in-game choice? Are battlecruisers still tiered as battleships?

　　你們?cè)谝曨l里面說過，有的巡洋艦有381MM的主炮?游戲中也是這樣么?戰(zhàn)巡是算戰(zhàn)列艦么?

　　Yes. For the other question: mostly yes, though there might be some that will be classed as cruisers if they fit in better with that class.

　　是啊，游戲中也行。還有，大部分戰(zhàn)巡歸入戰(zhàn)列艦，不過也有部分歸入巡洋艦

　　will the ships use only hit point system or there will be any float values?

　　戰(zhàn)艦是不是只有HP?還是說有別的浮力參數(shù)?

　　Ships use only a hit point system at the moment. We currently don*t see the need for a separate life bar. However, flooding and other effects will simulate float values to a degree.

　　目前只有HP系統(tǒng)。我們覺得目前還不需要”第二個(gè)血條“，然而，進(jìn)水和其他效果將在某種程度上模擬浮力參數(shù)。

　　n the Tech Trees shown at Gamescon,

　　battleships started at tier 3 and you said that was a permanent decision.

　　Carriers started from tier 4. Does that mean that carriers will only start from tier 4, or had the lower ier ships simply not been modelled?

　　從游戲展上面的科技樹來看

　　BB從3級(jí)開始，這個(gè)大家都知道

　　CV好像從4級(jí)開始，CV是不是從4級(jí)開始呢?還是說有低級(jí)CV,不過沒有做出來而已?

　　Yes, this is correct. Battleships will start from tier 3 and Carriers from tier 4.

　　嗯，BB從3級(jí)開始，CV從4級(jí)開始

　　4)When a bomber attacks an enemy ship,will it try to avoid the AA guns of the enemy ships or will it just fly straight towards it and ignoring the damage it sustained from the enemy AA guns?

　　如果轟炸機(jī)攻擊敵方時(shí)，轟炸機(jī)會(huì)規(guī)避防空炮火，還是直接朝著目標(biāo)死亡沖鋒啊?

　　For now you won*t see any maneuvers, though they are reflected in the mechanics.

　　現(xiàn)在是沒有規(guī)避機(jī)動(dòng)的動(dòng)畫效果，但是在系統(tǒng)計(jì)算的時(shí)候會(huì)考慮規(guī)避機(jī)動(dòng)。

　　Assuming that Sverdlov is still tier IX and Varyag is still tier III, is it correct to say that:

　　Nakhimov/Svetlana: tier IV

　　Kirov: tier V

　　Ghorky or Project 28: tier VI

　　Project 68 three triple turrets preliminary: tier VII

　　Chapayev: tier VIII

　　話說斯維爾德洛夫是9級(jí)，瓦良格是3級(jí)，那也就是說

　　納希莫夫海軍上將級(jí)/斯維特拉娜級(jí)是4級(jí)，基洛夫(不是那個(gè)導(dǎo)彈巡洋艦!!)是5級(jí)，28號(hào)工程是6級(jí)，3炮塔68工程是7級(jí)，恰巴耶夫是8級(jí)咯?

　　Currently it looks like this: Chervonaya Ukraina IV --> Komintern V --> Chapayev VI --> Molotov VII --> Sverdlov VIII

　　是這樣的納希莫夫海軍上將級(jí)(4)——共產(chǎn)國際級(jí)(5)————恰巴耶夫級(jí)(6)————基洛夫級(jí)(不是那個(gè)導(dǎo)彈巡洋艦，也不是那個(gè)飛艇!!!)(7)————斯維爾德洛夫級(jí)(8)

　　Also, did you already decide how to implement Project 66? The 30,750 tons (full load) cruiser armed with 220mm guns. Is it feasible as top tier cruiser?‘

　　還有，你們打算如何處理66工程這個(gè)東西，滿載排水量30750T，用220MM炮的船?頂級(jí)巡洋艦么?

　　Yes, project 66 is currently slotted as the tier X cruiser in that line.

　　沒錯(cuò)，10級(jí)重巡